Monday, November 06, 2017

Up is the only direction from way in the bottom

In response to this post on the accident of birth, my commenter-friend disagrees with me and writes:
Just come to China, or India, go to a BPO company ... happiness seeing how far their children have come as compared to them.
I don't deny that these have happened.  Even the children from humble backgrounds have come a long way from those origins.

But, we need to separate two different aspects that we are talking about: The opportunities to anybody, versus the opportunities that exist for the privileged at birth.

Consider, for instance, the schools that kids attend.  Thanks to every government in the world advancing literacy and spending money on education, children from any background can now attend school. (Sadly, there are countries where girls are not educated.)  Even if students do not have electricity at home.

This is a cause for celebration, no doubt.  It is phenomenal an achievement.  We humans deserve credit for making such a world happen.

To look at that development and engage in self-congratulations is, well, not what I do.  To begin with, that is not my job--I am a critic, by choice and by profession.

For another, in this context, if we were to merely engage in rah-rah about literacy even for the disadvantaged, we begin to overlook the serious troubles there. 

Does one imagine, for instance, that a government school in rural Uttar Pradesh is anywhere near the quality of the school that I (and the commenter) went to?  Why are the kids in rural Uttar Pradesh condemned to those godawful schools where teachers might not even come to class, leave alone being horrible teachers in the classroom, while kids in Neyveli get much better education?  Not the kids' fault that they were accidentally born to their parents who live in a certain area, right?

Now, think about how education is merely one out of the gazillion ways in which the accidental birth makes a huge difference in one's life.

Most of us in the political left-of-center always worry ourselves to death that such inequality that arises for no fault ought to be addressed via public policies.  Even while celebrating the fantastic reductions in extreme and absolute poverty, we worry about the uneven competition that exists only because of the accident of birth.

And speaking of inequality, my go-to-expert on this, Branko Milanovic, writes about how complicated this topic is. 

I rest.

Source

2 comments:

Ramesh said...

Of course chance and luck play a part in life all the time. Not just the accident of birth. There are so many "accidents" along the way that determine life. To expect that we should neutralise the effect of such accidents and then create some magical level playing field is simply dreaming of utopia.

You should permit some self congratulation. You are coloured by the events in the US. What has happened firstly in China and then now in India is stunning. Hundreds of millions of people have socially, educationally, economically uplifted their lives five or ten times as compared to their parents. This is no mean achievement. That is far far more important than ensuring that everybody gets the same opportunity irrespective of growth.

You talk of a rural school in UP. Sure the school is often very poor in quality. But people from such backgrounds rise far. Tamil Nadu and Bengal which used to dominate the IAS are no longer the top contributors. The topmost contributor is UP and the second largest contributor is Bihar. Many of them come from small towns - not Lucknow or Kanpur.

I am not very sympathetic to the goal of complete equality in everything. That's not going to happen. Instead, I am absolutely fine with public policy that promotes rapid development in education and economic opportunity.

Sriram Khé said...

"Tamil Nadu and Bengal which used to dominate the IAS are no longer the top contributors."
Because people from TN and WB figured out a long time ago that there is a wonderful world of opportunities outside the IAS. I am willing to bet that this change is highly correlated with the political-economic dynamics of the past thirty years.

I am not arguing for "complete equality in everything." Not at all. But, it is reckless to overlook how much birth determines the access to, or lack of, all kinds of opportunities that then influence pretty much every aspect of one's life.

An acknowledgement of this unevenness at birth will then compel us to develop public policies that will address the issues.